Overview and Scrutiny Committee minutes

Committee minutes · Overview and Scrutiny Committee · Wed 10 Dec 2025 · Hastings Borough Council

Read the council's document ↗

In plain English

Each sentence was checked against the passage it cites; how the checking works.

Decided · A decision has been taken.

Members noted a forecast adverse variance to budget of £621,298 for direct service expenditure to 31 March 2026, partly offset by £217,937 of unbudgeted earmarked reserves, with the General Reserve forecast at £6.4 million against a recommended minimum of £4 million. p10

2 further sentences of this summary were held back by verification and are not shown. We only publish claims that survived checking against the cited passages.

Show the 1 passage this is based on
  • p107. Financial and Performance Monitoring Kit Wheeler, Chief Finance Officer provided a summary of the financial outturn position for services at the end of Period 6 (September 2025). Members were asked to note that the report now linked finance with performance. The forecasted outturn for the 12 months to 31 March 2026 was an adverse variance to budget of £621,298 for direct service expenditure. However, this was partially offset by a use of unbudgeted earmarked reserves £217,937. Budgeted savings identified through the PIER programme were ongoing. Of the budgeted £429,500, it was expected the full amount of savings would be achieved. In line with the revised reserves policy the recommended minimum balance for the General Reserve was £4m. The General Reserve balance was forecasted to be £6.4m at the year-end. The Chief Finance Officer explained that addressing temporary housing issues would significantly improve HBC’s financial position, as temporary accommodation pressures were greater locally than elsewhere. Capital sums were identified as the largest risk, requiring greater scrutiny. Councillor Haffenden reported that a housing task force would address temporary accommodation, and proposed that the Overview and Scrutiny Committee could examine that further. The Ashdown development had been delayed but was expected to be resolved soon. Councillor Marlow-Eastwood queried how the social impact of the Ashdown development would be measured. Councillor Haffenden explained that Ashdown was not 100% social housing but included mixed tenures such as shared ownership and affordable housing. Feedback from Ashdown residents had been positive, and a document setting out the tenure types would be circulated to Committee members. Councillor Smith noted that temporary accommodation trends had stabilised and asked whether that would continue. Councillor Haffenden replied that it would stabilise with appropriate funding.

Places and organisations it names

Other papers for this meeting

The council's document is the record; this page collects what Open Hastings knows about it. If something here is wrong, it is corrected in place and logged on the about page.