Scrutiny Review of Street Works

Committee report · Place Scrutiny Committee · Thu 19 Mar 2026 · East Sussex County Council

Read the council's document ↗

What it recommends

In the report's own words. A recommendation is a proposal: the meeting can agree, change or reject it.

What the meeting decided

The minutes record: Noted. “RESOLVED to note the report of the Review Board and that this would be further considered by the incoming committee ahead of reporting to Cabinet and Council. </AI8> <TRAILER_SECTION>” minutes ↗

In plain English

Each sentence was checked against the passage it cites; how the checking works.

Recommended · This went to the meeting on Thu 19 Mar 2026. What was decided is in that meeting's minutes.

The review covered the planning and coordination of street works, minimising disruption for pedestrians, cyclists and public transport users, utility company reinstatements, incentives for utility companies, and learning from best practice elsewhere. p8p9p10p11p12

The East Sussex Lane Rental Scheme, which started in April 2025, was not included in the review because the Board felt it needed more time to bed in before it could be properly assessed. p13

The Review Board was chaired by Councillor Murphy and also included Councillors Hilton, Hollidge, Lunn and Redstone. p14

2 further sentences of this summary were held back by verification and are not shown. We only publish claims that survived checking against the cited passages.

Show the 7 passages this is based on
  • p81.3 The scope of the review was agreed to include:
  • p9· The planning and coordination of street works, with and between the Council and utility companies, and the use of the permit scheme.
  • p10· Minimising disruption of works, through the planning of diversion routes, avoiding disruptions for pedestrians (especially wheelchair users and those with visual impairments), cyclists, and public transport users.
  • p11· Utility company reinstatements. · Incentives for improved management and collaboration by utility companies.
  • p12· Learning from other areas and national best practice.
  • p131.4 The East Sussex Lane Rental Scheme was not within the scope of the review. Due to only having started in April 2025, the Board considered that it needed more time to bed in before its impacts and effectiveness could be well understood and subject to scrutiny.
  • p142. Supporting information 2.1 The Scrutiny Review Board was comprised of Councillors Hilton, Hollidge, Lunn, Murphy (Chair) and Redstone.

Places and organisations it names

Other papers for this meeting

The council's document is the record; this page collects what Open Hastings knows about it. If something here is wrong, it is corrected in place and logged on the about page.