Scrutiny Review of Street Works
What it recommends
- “consider the draft report and recommendations of the Scrutiny Review Board and to either: a) endorse the report and agree to submit the recommendations to Cabinet for comment and County Council for approval; or b) agree to re-open the review for further consideration by the new committee and appoint a Review Board to undertake this work.”
What the meeting decided
The minutes record: Agreed. “RESOLVED to endorse the report and agree to submit the recommendations to Cabinet for comment and County Council for approval. </AI8> <TRAILER_SECTION>” minutes ↗
In plain English
Recommended · This went to the meeting on Wed 22 Jul 2026. What was decided is in that meeting's minutes.
This report asks the Place Scrutiny Committee to consider the outcomes of a Scrutiny Review into street works, carried out by a Review Board of Councillors Hilton, Hollidge, Lunn, Murphy and Redstone, chaired by Councillor Steve Murphy. p3p4p15
The review looked at the planning and coordination of street works between the Council and utility companies, ways to minimise disruption for road users, utility company reinstatements to roads after works, incentives for better management and collaboration, and lessons from other areas and national best practice. p9p10p11p12p13p14
Show the 9 passages this is based on
- p3Scrutiny Review of Street Works Purpose:
- p4To consider the outcomes of the Scrutiny Review undertaken by the previous Committee.
- p91.4 On the recommendation of the Scoping Board, the Place Scrutiny Committee subsequently agreed to establish a Review Board for the purposes of undertaking a scrutiny review. The scope of the review was agreed to include the following lines of enquiry as the basis for a scrutiny review:
- p10· The planning and coordination of street works, with and between the Council and utility companies, and the use of the permit scheme.
- p11· Minimising disruption of works, through the planning of diversion routes, avoiding disruptions for pedestrians (especially wheelchair users and those with visual impairments), cyclists, and public transport users.
- p12· Utility company reinstatements to roads following works.
- p13· Incentives for improved management and collaboration on street works by utility companies.
- p14· Learning from other areas and national best practice.
- p152. Supporting information 2.1 The Scrutiny Review Board was comprised of Councillors Hilton, Hollidge, Lunn, Murphy and Redstone. Cllr Steve Murphy was appointed Chair of the Review Board. 2.2 The attached report ( Appendix 1 ) contains the findings and recommendations of the Review Board. The report was considered at the previous Place Scrutiny Committee’s meeting on 19 March 2026. The usual process for Scrutiny Review reports is that a completed review report agreed by the scrutiny committee is submitted to the Cabinet for comment and subsequently to Full Council for agreement, alongside the Cabinet’s proposed response to the recommendations of the review.
Places and organisations it names
Other papers for this meeting
- Place Scrutiny Committee agenda
- Appendix 1 - Place Committee work programme June 2026
- Appendix 1 Scrutiny input to RPPR diagram
- Appendix 2 - Printed plan Forward Plan 1 July 2026 - 31 October 2026 Forward Plan
- Appendix 2 Q4 Place Scrutiny
- Appendix 3 - Future decisions Place Scrutiny July 2026
- Appendix 3 State of the County 2026
- East Sussex Highways Year 3 Contract Performance
- Minutes of the previous meeting
- Place Scrutiny Committee minutes (draft)
- Reconciling Policy, Performance and Resources (RPPR)
- Scrutiny Review of Street Works - report final
- Work programme