Scrutiny Review of Street Works

Committee report · Place Scrutiny Committee · Wed 22 Jul 2026 · East Sussex County Council

Read the council's document ↗

What it recommends

In the report's own words. A recommendation is a proposal: the meeting can agree, change or reject it.

What the meeting decided

The minutes record: Agreed. “RESOLVED to endorse the report and agree to submit the recommendations to Cabinet for comment and County Council for approval. </AI8> <TRAILER_SECTION>” minutes ↗

In plain English

Each sentence was checked against the passage it cites; how the checking works.

Recommended · This went to the meeting on Wed 22 Jul 2026. What was decided is in that meeting's minutes.

This report asks the Place Scrutiny Committee to consider the outcomes of a Scrutiny Review into street works, carried out by a Review Board of Councillors Hilton, Hollidge, Lunn, Murphy and Redstone, chaired by Councillor Steve Murphy. p3p4p15

The review looked at the planning and coordination of street works between the Council and utility companies, ways to minimise disruption for road users, utility company reinstatements to roads after works, incentives for better management and collaboration, and lessons from other areas and national best practice. p9p10p11p12p13p14

2 further sentences of this summary were held back by verification and are not shown. We only publish claims that survived checking against the cited passages.

Show the 9 passages this is based on
  • p3Scrutiny Review of Street Works Purpose:
  • p4To consider the outcomes of the Scrutiny Review undertaken by the previous Committee.
  • p91.4 On the recommendation of the Scoping Board, the Place Scrutiny Committee subsequently agreed to establish a Review Board for the purposes of undertaking a scrutiny review. The scope of the review was agreed to include the following lines of enquiry as the basis for a scrutiny review:
  • p10· The planning and coordination of street works, with and between the Council and utility companies, and the use of the permit scheme.
  • p11· Minimising disruption of works, through the planning of diversion routes, avoiding disruptions for pedestrians (especially wheelchair users and those with visual impairments), cyclists, and public transport users.
  • p12· Utility company reinstatements to roads following works.
  • p13· Incentives for improved management and collaboration on street works by utility companies.
  • p14· Learning from other areas and national best practice.
  • p152. Supporting information 2.1 The Scrutiny Review Board was comprised of Councillors Hilton, Hollidge, Lunn, Murphy and Redstone. Cllr Steve Murphy was appointed Chair of the Review Board. 2.2 The attached report ( Appendix 1 ) contains the findings and recommendations of the Review Board. The report was considered at the previous Place Scrutiny Committee’s meeting on 19 March 2026. The usual process for Scrutiny Review reports is that a completed review report agreed by the scrutiny committee is submitted to the Cabinet for comment and subsequently to Full Council for agreement, alongside the Cabinet’s proposed response to the recommendations of the review.

Places and organisations it names

Other papers for this meeting

The council's document is the record; this page collects what Open Hastings knows about it. If something here is wrong, it is corrected in place and logged on the about page.