Work programme

Committee report · Place Scrutiny Committee · Thu 27 Nov 2025 · East Sussex County Council

Read the council's document ↗

What it recommends

In the report's own words. A recommendation is a proposal: the meeting can agree, change or reject it.

What the meeting decided

The minutes record: Agreed. “RESOLVED to: 1) agree the latest work programme as set out at Appendix 1 to ensure it reflects the correct focus of the committee including in relation to its role in the ongoing RPPR process; 2) review upcoming items on East Sussex County Council’s Forward Plan as set out at Appendix 2 to identify any issues that may require more detailed scrutiny; 3) agree the recommendation of the Scoping Board on Street Works to progress with a scrutiny review, and agree the membership and Chair of that review as set out at…” minutes ↗

In plain English

Each sentence was checked against the passage it cites; how the checking works.

Recommended · This went to the meeting on Thu 27 Nov 2025. What was decided is in that meeting's minutes.

The Place Scrutiny Committee is recommended to review and agree its work programme, review upcoming items on the Council's Forward Plan, agree to progress a scrutiny review of street works following the Scoping Board's recommendation, and agree to form a reference group to scrutinise the Exceat Bridge replacement project. p5p6p7p8

Following a Public Inquiry in May 2025, the Government has provided the legal orders needed for the Exceat Bridge replacement project to proceed as planned. p19

The Street Works Scoping Board recommended that a review focus on improving the planning and coordination of street works by utility companies and minimising disruption, without looking at the Lane Rental Scheme. p14

Show the 6 passages this is based on
  • p51) review and agree the latest work programme as set out at Appendix 1 to ensure it reflects the correct focus of the committee including in relation to its role in the ongoing RPPR process; and
  • p62) review upcoming items on East Sussex County Council’s Forward Plan as set out at Appendix 2 to identify any issues that may require more detailed scrutiny;
  • p73) agree the recommendation of the Scoping Board on Street Works to progress with a scrutiny review, and agree the membership and Chair of that review as set out at paragraph 2.2.
  • p84) agree to form a reference group to scrutinise the Exceat Bridge replacement project, and agree the membership as set out at paragraph 2.7.
  • p142.3 The Scoping Board recommended that a review should take place that is focused on developing recommendations to improve the planning and coordination of street works undertaken by utility companies and minimising the disruption of works. The Board also agreed that the Lane Rental Scheme would not be looked at as part of this review, due to being relatively new and needing time to be fully established before detailed scrutiny could take place. The Board felt it would be helpful hold a further meeting with highways officers to understand the permitting and network management processes and the current challenges with this, which would help determine the key lines of inquiry for questioning utility company representatives at future review meetings. The Board therefore agreed for the Terms of Reference, setting out the scope of the review, to be drawn up following that meeting.
  • p19Exceat Bridge 2.7 Following the Public Inquiry in May 2025, the Government has now provided the necessary legal orders for the Exceat Bridge replacement project to proceed as planned. Taking on board the discussion the committee recently had at its awayday regarding how it can scrutinise ongoing projects, it is proposed to consider this through the Exceat Bridge as a major infrastructure project that is due to commence. The committee is recommended to form a reference group to scrutinise the project with proposed membership: Cllr Murphy, Cllr Redstone, Cllr Shing and Cllr Wright.

Places and organisations it names

Other papers for this meeting

The council's document is the record; this page collects what Open Hastings knows about it. If something here is wrong, it is corrected in place and logged on the about page.